HOW BREAKER FAILURE RELAYING WORKS?
Primary relays operate for a fault in their zone of protection in the shortest time and remove the fewest system elements to clear the fault. On the other hand, backup relays operate in the event that the primary relays fail. Backup relays can be local or remote. Our interest here is in a subset of local backup relays, referred to as breaker failure relays.
We will now consider this important topic in greater detail. Figure 1 shows a simple representation of lines and transformers around a bus. For the moment, we have shown one circuit breaker per line or transformer.
A fault at F on line B-C should be cleared by primary relays Rbc and Rcb and their respective circuit breakers. Now consider the possibility that circuit breaker B1 fails to clear the fault. This failure may be caused by the failure of the primary relays, by the failure of current transformers (CTs) or potential transformers (PTs) providing input to the primary relays, by the failure of the station battery, or by the failure of the circuit breaker.
Figure 1 – Representation of Lines and Transformers around a bus |
The remote backup function is provided by relays at buses A, D, and E to clear the fault F if it is not cleared by circuit breaker B1. However, remote backup protection is often unsatisfactory in modern power systems.
First, it must be slow enough to coordinate with all the associated primary relays. Thus, the remote backup function at bus A must coordinate with the zone 2 relays of lines B–C, B–D, and the transformer B–E. Second, because of the possible infeeds at the remote stations, it may be difficult to set the remote backup relays to see fault F from stations A, D, and E.
Finally, the power supplied to the tapped loads on lines A–B and B–D is unnecessarily lost due to remote backup operation. A preferred method of protection against the failure of the primary relays at stations B and C is to provide a second set of relays at these locations, represented by R‘bc at station B in Figure 2.
|
These relays operate more slowly than Rbc and Rcb but trip the same circuit breakers. They cover the failure of the primary relays and their associated CTs, the secondary windings of the associated PTs, and, as shown in Figure 3, the DC distribution circuit of the primary relays.
However, relays R‘bc does not cover the failure of the circuit breakers themselves.
To guard against this contingency, breaker failure relays are provided. When this scheme was first introduced, a separate protective relay was provided, using an independent set of CTs, PT secondary windings, and DC circuits to trip the appropriate circuit breakers.
In the above Figure 1, for example, breakers 3, 5, and 7 would be tripped by the breaker failure relays. Subsequent developments 6 replaced the independent relay with the control circuitry shown in Figure 3.
In this scheme, any relay or switch which initiates a trip starts a timer known as the breaker failure timer. The timer is supervised (i.e. controlled) by an overcurrent relay (50-1), which drops out when the current through the breaker goes to zero. If this does not happen for any reason, the timer times out and energizes the lockout relay 86-1, which trips and locks out the circuit breakers 3, 5, and 7.
Figure 3 – DC distribution for primary, backup, and breaker failure relays |
The earliest designs of the circuit breaker failure logic used a breaker auxiliary switch in place of the overcurrent relay. This switch is operated by mechanical or hydraulic linkages and is designed to mimic the main contacts of the circuit breaker.
However, the auxiliary switch has been found to be an unreliable device, especially when the circuit breaker itself is experiencing difficulties in clearing the fault, a condition for which the breaker failure relaying is supposed to provide a remedy. The mechanical linkages may break, the auxiliary switches or the main contacts may be frozen, or for some reason become inoperative while the main set of breaker contacts continues to function normally.
There are some instances, however, when the breaker may be required to trip, even when there is no fault current to be interrupted. In such cases, a current detector cannot be used.
The most common example of this condition (when there is no fault current to be interrupted) is the trip initiated by turbine or boiler controls. Abnormalities in the pressure or temperature of the boiler, or some other mechanical critical element of the boiler-turbine system, may require that the station breaker be tripped, and in such cases, it would be improper to use an overcurrent detector to supervise the breaker failure protection.
This technical article is centered upon the simple single-bus, single-bus arrangement. In reality, for other bus arrangements, a more involved procedure is required.
0 Comments